The setting of the original movie in the '60s seemed a bizarre choice which added nothing to the movie. Just the establishment of the doll in this creepy, forbidden room makes it a million times scarier than it ever was in the first film.ģ.
In this sequel, the doll is situated in a room the protagonists are forbidden to enter, but which the door to enter is sometimes mysteriously open. We were never really invited to be scared of it, and weren't sure what we were supposed to be scared of. In the first movie, we weren't sure if the doll was haunted, or evil, or both. These young actors are able to carry the movie and generate sympathy.Ģ. The best characters, however, are played by the young girls, who do so much of a better job than the nobodies who fronted the previous film, despite being less than half the age of that pair.
It is much better cast, with dependable character actors like Anthony LaPaglia and Miranda Otto in background roles. Let's look at all the ways this sequel, or spin-off, or whatever you want to call it, is superior to the first movie:ġ. Toward the end, though, I realised that that was rather faint praise. Reviewed by jadavix 6 / 10 / 10 Better, but still pretty averageĭuring the first half an hour of "Annabelle: Creation", I knew I was seeing a far superior movie to the original "Annabelle", which I watched immediately before it.